Skip to Content
Art

AB 2609 Text ~ Graffiti Law

10:35 PM PDT on July 30, 2008

    A local newspaper reports on AB2609, which, in part, requires people convicted of graffiti-related crimes keep clean the area they're convicted clean and free of additional tagging or graffiti. The law was introduced by LA rep. Mike Davis. Here is the text of the bill:

    AB 2609, Davis. Vandalism: penalties: community service.
    Existing law, amended by Proposition 21, an initiative measure
    enacted by voters at the March 7, 2000, statewide primary election,
    and requiring a 2/3 vote of the Legislature to amend, makes a person
    who maliciously commits specified destructive acts with respect to
    another's property guilty of vandalism. Existing law grants the court
    the authority to order a defendant who is convicted of violating
    this provision, or to order the defendant and his or her parents, if
    the defendant is a minor, to clean up, repair, or replace the damaged
    property or keep the damaged property or another specified property
    in the community free of graffiti for up to one year.
    This bill would, in addition, require a court, when appropriate
    and feasible, to impose the above cleanup penalties for any defendant
    who was convicted of violating those vandalism provisions, as
    specified. By increasing the penalties for a crime, the bill would
    impose a state-mandated local program.
    The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
    agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
    state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
    reimbursement.
    This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
    act for a specified reason.

    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

    SECTION 1. Section 594 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
    594. (a) Every person who maliciously commits any of the
    following acts with respect to any real or personal property not his
    or her own, in cases other than those specified by state law, is
    guilty of vandalism:
    (1) Defaces with graffiti or other inscribed material.
    (2) Damages.
    (3) Destroys.
    Whenever a person violates this subdivision with respect to real
    property, vehicles, signs, fixtures, furnishings, or property
    belonging to any public entity, as defined by Section 811.2 of the
    Government Code, or the federal government, it shall be a permissive
    inference that the person neither owned the property nor had the
    permission of the owner to deface, damage, or destroy the property.
    (b) (1) If the amount of defacement, damage, or destruction is
    four hundred dollars ($400) or more, vandalism is punishable by
    imprisonment in the state prison or in a county jail not exceeding
    one year, or by a fine of not more than ten thousand dollars
    ($10,000), or if the amount of defacement, damage, or destruction is
    ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or more, by a fine of not more than
    fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), or by both that fine and
    imprisonment.
    (2) (A) If the amount of defacement, damage, or destruction is
    less than four hundred dollars ($400), vandalism is punishable by
    imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine of
    not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine
    and imprisonment.
    (B) If the amount of defacement, damage, or destruction is less
    than four hundred dollars ($400), and the defendant has been
    previously convicted of vandalism or affixing graffiti or other
    inscribed material under Section 594, 594.3, 594.4, 640.5, 640.6, or
    640.7, vandalism is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for
    not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than five thousand
    dollars ($5,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
    (c) Upon conviction of any person under this section for acts of
    vandalism consisting of defacing property with graffiti or other
    inscribed materials, the court shall, when appropriate and feasible,
    in addition to any punishment imposed under subdivision (b), order
    the defendant to clean up, repair, or replace the damaged property
    himself or herself, or order the defendant, and his or her parents or
    guardians if the defendant is a minor, to keep the damaged property
    or another specified property in the community free of graffiti for
    up to one year. Participation of a parent or guardian is not required
    under this subdivision if the court deems this participation to be
    detrimental to the defendant, or if the parent or guardian is a
    single parent who must care for young children. If the court finds
    that graffiti cleanup is inappropriate, the court shall consider
    other types of community service, where feasible.
    (d) If a minor is personally unable to pay a fine levied for acts
    prohibited by this section, the parent of that minor shall be liable
    for payment of the fine. A court may waive payment of the fine, or
    any part thereof, by the parent upon a finding of good cause.
    (e) As used in this section, the term "graffiti or other inscribed
    material" includes any unauthorized inscription, word, figure, mark,
    or design, that is written, marked, etched, scratched, drawn, or
    painted on real or personal property.
    (f) The court may order any person ordered to perform community
    service or graffiti removal pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision
    (c) to undergo counseling.
    (g) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2002.
    SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
    Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
    the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
    district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or
    infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
    for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the
    Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the
    meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
    Constitution.

    Stay in touch

    Sign up for our free newsletter

    More from L.A. TACO

    Juárez-Style Burritos Have Arrived in Southern California, And They are Already Selling Out In Less than An Hour

    The month-old strip mall taquería in Anaheim make all their flour tortillas from scratch using both lard and butter, resulting in an extremely tender vehicle for their juicy guisados like carne en su jugo, carne deshebrada, chile colorado, chile relleno, and chicharrón. Every tortilla is cooked to order, too.

    April 23, 2024

    Urgent: L.A. TACO Falling Short of Fundraising Goals and Needs Your Support

    Emergency. This is not a test. This is not a ruse. This is not a marketing scheme. We need your support if we're going to make it and every single membership counts.

    April 23, 2024

    The 11 Best Backyard Restaurants in Los Angeles

    Despite many requests to publish this guide, L.A. TACO has been somewhat protective of these gems to not "burn out the spots." However, we wanted to share it with our small, loyal pool of paid members, as we appreciate your support (and know you to be okay, non-NARCs). Please enjoy responsibly and keep these 'hood secrets...secrets.

    April 18, 2024

    Here’s What an L.A. TACO Membership Gets You and Why You Should Support Local Journalism

    With more than 30 members-only perks at the best L.A. restaurants, breweries, and dispensaries waiting to be unlocked, the L.A. TACO membership pays for itself!

    April 17, 2024
    See all posts