Comments on: AB 2609 Text ~ Graffiti Law

By: Reps

Reps — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:21:36 +0000

word up, i write on abandoned bulidings, as a tagger (not a vandal) i know not to write on stuff like people’s cars or houses or churches thats just disrespect in my eyes

By: mike_s

mike_s — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:21:25 +0000

There is no “graff code” except for the one you make for yourself, but that’s like anything in life.

People do graffiti for all different kinds of reasons, some to intentionally vandalize private property, some to beautify abandoned buildings. When it comes down to it, most people can see the difference between the two kinds of graffiti, but it will ALWAYS be clumped together as graffiti

By: V

Fri, 08 May 2009 17:48:35 +0000

Alright, WE do. That means us too. WE may PAY for it, but it is public property, which means it falls under government rule.

Graffiti is done on public places because we WANT the city to pay for it as a type of peaceful protest* (note: I’m not speaking for EVERY graf artist, only myself and my crew). It’s against graf code to paint on PRIVATE property.

The people who do that are idiot taggers that should NEVER be clumped in with graf artists. We aren’t the same.

By: sleepyfakinD

sleepyfakinD — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:49:08 +0000

“you” do. but how are you helping those who need to help themselves.

By: Juvenile Lawyer

Juvenile Lawyer — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:01:09 +0000

The new law appears to makes it mandatory for a court to order someone convicted of graffiti to clean up graffiti. The only exception is freeway signs that hang over a freeway. Unfortunately having to clean up graffiti in some neighborhoods put the taggers safety at risk. Judges should have the final say.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-graffiti31-2008jul31,0,2573143.story?track=rss